Библиография

 

Предисловие

1.      Surowiecki James. Feature Presentation // New Yorker, 2007. May 28. URL: www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2007/05/28/ 070528ta_talk_surowiecki?printable = true.

2.      Efjron Marc, Greenslade Shelly and Saloh Michelle. Top Companies for Leaders 2005 // Lincolnshire, IL: Hewitt Associates LLC, 2005.

3.   New Talent Management Network // Second Annual Talent Management Survey, 2009. January.

URL: www.newtmn.com/includes/documents/2nd_annual_ NTMN_Survey.pdf.

 

 

Глава 1

1.         Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and the Economist Intelligence Unit. Aligned at the Top: How Business and HR Executives View Today’s Most Significant People Challenges — and What They’re Doing About It. N. Y., Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, 2007. May 6;

Strack Ranier, Caye Jean-Michel, Leicht Michael, Villis Ulrich, Bohm Hans, and McDonnell Michael. The Future of HR in Europe: Key Challenges Through 2015. Boston: Boston Consulting Group, 2007. June 16;

Guthridge Matthew, Komm Matthew and Lawson Emily. Making Talent a Strategic Priority. McKinsey Quarterly, 2008. № 1. P. 50-59.

2.         Effron Marc, Greenslade Shelly and Saloh Michelle. Top Companies for Leaders 2005. Lincolnshire, IL: Hewitt Associates LLC, 2005;

Huselid Mark, Jackson Susan and Randall Schuler. Technical and Strategic Human Resources Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance // Academy of Management Journal 40, 1997. № 1. February. P. 171-188.

3.         Avon Products, Inc. The Avon Opportunity // Annual Report 2007. URL: www.avoncompany.com/investor/annualreport/pdf/ annualreport2008.pdf, October 8, 2009.

4.         Lominger Michael and Eichinger Robert. The Leadership Machine: Architecture to Develop Leaders for Any Future. Minneapolis, MN: Lominger International. 2002.

 

Глава 2

1.         Pulakos Elaine. A Roadmap for Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating Performance Management Systems. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Foundation, 2004.

2.         Chronology of Employee Performance Management in the Federal Government. URL: www.opm.gov/perform/chron.asp. (23.01 2009)

3.         Locke Edwin and Latham Gary. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.; Vroom Victor. Work and Motivation. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.

4.         Locke and Latham. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.

5.         Vroom. Work and Motivation.

6.         Locke and Latham. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.

7.         Simons Daniel and Chabris Christopher. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events // Perception, 1999. №28. P. 1059-1074.

8.         Ordonez Lisa, Scheitzer Maurice, Galinsky Adam and Bazerman Max. Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting // Academy of Management Perspectives 23, 2009. February 1. P. 6-16.

9.         Cheng Mandy, Luckett Peter and Mahama Habib. Effect of Perceived Conflict Among Multiple Performance Goals and Goal Difficulty on Task Performance // Accounting and Finance 47, 2007. №2. P.221-242.

10.       Locke Edwin, Smith Ken, Erez Miriam, Chah Dong-Ok and Schaffer Adam. The Effect of Intra-Individual Goal Conflict on Performance // Journal of Management 20, 1994. P. 67-91.

11.       Erez Miriam and Arad R. Participative Goal Setting, Motivational and Cognitive Factors // Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 1986. № 591-597.

12.       Latham Gary, Erez Miriam and Locke Edwin. Resolving Scientific Disputes by the Joint Design of Crucial Experiments by the Antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham Dispute Regarding Participation in Goal Setting // Journal of Applied Psychology 73, 1988. P. 753-772.

13.       Scullen Steven, Bergey Paul and Aiman-Smith Lynda. Forced Distribution Rating Systems and the Improvement of Workforce Potential: A Baseline Simulation // Personnel Pscyhology 58, 2005. № 1. P. 1-32.

14.       Landy Frank and Farr James. Performance Rating // Psychological Bulletin 876, 1980. № 1. P. 72-107.

15.       Kingstrom Paul and Bass Alan. A Critical Analysis of Studies Comparing Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) and Other Rating Formats // Personnel Psychology 34, 2006. № 9. P. 263-289.

16.       Bretz Robert, Milkovich George and Read Walter. The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions, and Implications // Journal of Management 18, 1992. P.321-352.

17.       Tsui Anne and Ohlott Patricia. Multiple Assessment of Managerial Effectiveness: Interrater Agreement and Consensus in Effectiveness Models // Personnel Psychology 41, 1988. P. 779-803.

 

Глава 3

1. Latham Gary and Locke Edward. Self-regulation Through Goal Setting // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 1991. P. 212-247; Toegel Gina and Conger Jay. 360°-Degree Assessment:

Time for Reinvention // Academy of Management Learning and Education 2, 2003. № 3. P. 297-311.

2.         Ammons Robert. Effects of Knowledge of Performance: A Survey and Tentative Theoretical Formulation // Journal of General Psychology 54, 1956. P.279-299.

3.         Kluger Avraham and DeNisi Angelo. The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory // Psychological Bulletin 119, 1996. P.254-284.

4.         Там же.

5.         Там же.

6.         Smither James, Brett Joan and Atwater Leanne. What Do Leaders Recall About Their Multisource Feedback? // Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 14, 2008. № 3. P. 202-218.

7.         Там же.

8.         Goldsmith Marshall and Morgan Howard. Leadership Is a Contact Sport // Strategy + Business, 2004. August. P. 71-79.

9.         Goldsmith Marshall. Leadership Development: Try Feedforward Instead of Feedback //Journal for Quality and Participation 26,2003. № 3. P. 38-42.

10.       Tsui Anne and Ohlott Patricia. Multiple Assessment of Managerial Effectiveness: Interrater Agreement and Consensus in Effectiveness Models // Personnel Psychology 41, 1988. № 4. P. 779-803.

11. London Manuel and Smither J. Can Multi-Source Feedback Change Perceptions of Goal Accomplishment, Self-Evaluations, and Performance Related Outcomes? // Personnel Psychology 48, 1995. № 4. P. 803-839.

 

Глава 4

1.         Effron Marc, Greenslade Shelly and Salob Michelle. Top Companies for Leaders 2005. Lincolnshire, IL: Hewitt Associates LLC, 2005.

2.         Shen Wei and Cannella Albert Jr. Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impact of Successor Type, Post-succession Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO Tenure // Academy of Management Journal 45,2002. № 4. P. 717-733.

3.         Hough Leaetta and Oswald Frederick. Personnel Selection: Looking Towards the Future — Remembering the Past // Annual Review of Psychology 51, 2000. February. P. 631-664.

4.         Schmidt Frank and Hunter John. General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86,2004. № 1. P. 162-173.

5.         Там же.

6.         Там же.

7.         Bobko Philip, Roth Philip and Potosky Denise. Derivation and Implications of a Meta-Analytic Matrix Incorporating Cognitive Ability, Alternative Predictors, and Job Performance // Personnel Psychology 52, 1999. №3. P. 561-589.

8.         Ones Deniz, Dilcerht Stephan, Viswesvaran Chockalingam and Judge Timothy. In Support of Personality Assessment in Organization Settings // Personnel Psychology 60, 2007. № 4. P. 995-1027.

9.         Mount Michael and Barrick Murray. The Big Five Personality Dimensions: Implications for Research and Practice in Human Resource Management // Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 13, 1995. P. 153-200.

10.       O’Reilly III Charles, Chatman Jennifer and Caldwell David. People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit // Academy of Management Journal 34, 1991. № 3. September. P. 487-516.

11.       Effron Marc, Greenslade Shelly and Salob Michelle. Top Companies for Leaders 2005. Lincolnshire, IL: Hewitt Associates LLC, 2005.

12.       Там же.

 

Глава 5

1.         Thackray John. Feedback for Real // Gallup Management Journal. 2001. March 3. URL: www.gmj.gallup.com

2.         Rucci Anthony /., Kirn Steven P. and Quinn Richard T. The Employee-Customer-Profit Chain at Sears // Harvard Business Review, 1998. January — February. P. 82-97.

3.         Perrin Towers. Closing the Engagement Gap: A Roadmap for Driving Superior Business Results // Global Workforce Study. Stamford, CT: Towers Perrin, 2009.

4.         Ott Bryan. Investors, Take Note: Engagement Boosts Earnings. URL: gmj.gallup.com (06.14.2007)

5.         Gibbons John. Employee Engagement // A Review of Current Research and Its Implications. N. Y.: Conference Board, 2006.

6.         Schaufeli Wilmar, Salanova Marissa, Gonzalez-Roma Vincente and Вakker Arnold. The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach // Journal of Happiness Studies 3, 2002. № 1. P. 71-92.

7.         Harter James and Schmidt Frank. Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity // Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1, 2008. № 1. P. 36-39.

8.         Herzberg Frederick, Mausner Bernard and Block Snyderman Barbara. The Motivation to Work. N. Y. John Wiley, 1959.

9.         Hackman Richard and Oldham Greg. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey // Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 1975. № 2. April. P. 159-170.

10.       Dvir Tally, Eden Dov, Avolio Bruce and Shamir Boas. Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Study // Academy of Management Journal 45, 2002. № 4. P. 735-744.

11.       Rhoades Linda and Eisenberger Robert. Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature // Journal of Applied Psychology 87,2002. №4. P. 698-714.

12.       Conger Jay, Alden Jay and Kanungo Rabindra. Charismatic Leadership in Organizations: Perceived Behavioral Attributes and Their Measurement // Journal of Organizational Behavior 15, 1994. № 5. September. P. 439-452.

13.       Macey William and Schneider Benjamin. The Meaning of Employee Engagement // Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice 1, 2008. N- 1. P. 3-30.

14.       Там же.

15.       Harter James, Schmidt Frank and Hayes Theodore. Business- Unit-Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis // Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 2002. № 2. P. 268-279.

16.       Perrin Towers. Closing the Engagement Gap: A Roadmap for Driving Superior Business Results. // Global Workforce Study. Stamford, CT: Towers Perrin, 2009.

17.       Gibbons. Employee Engagement.

18.       Poncheri Reanna, Lindberg Jennifer, Thompson Lori Foster and Eric Surface. A Comment on Employee Surveys: Negativity Bias in Open Ended Responses // Organizational Research Methods 11,2008. July. №3. P. 614-630.

19.       Krosnick Jon. Survey Research // Annual Review of Psychology 50, 1999. February. P. 537-567.

 

Глава 6

1.         Effron Marc, Greenslade Shelly and Saloh Michelle. Top Companies for Leaders 2005. Lincolnshire, IL: Hewitt Associates LLC, 2005.

2.         McClelland David. Testing for Competence Rather Than for Intelligence // American Psychologist 28, 1973. № 1. P. 1-14.

3.         Spencer Signe and Spencer Lyle. Competence at Work. N. Y.: John Wiley, 1973.

4.         Sparrow Paul. Organisational Competencies: A Valid Approach for the Future? // International Journal of Selection and Assessment 3,1995. №3. P. 168-177.

5.         McClelland David. Testing for Competence Rather Than for ‘Intelligence.

6.         Cockerill Tom, Hunt John and Schroder Harry. Managerial Competencies: Fact or Fiction? // Business Strategy Review 6, 1995. №3. P. 1-12.

7.         Barrett Gerald and Depinet Robert. A Reconsideration of Testing for Competence Rather Than Intelligence // American Psychologist 46, 1991. № 10. P. 101-124; Lawler Edward. Competencies: The Right Foundation for the New Pay? // CEO Publication G96-3 (297). Center for Effective Organizations, 1996. April. URL: www. ceo.usc. edu/pdf/G963297.pdf.

8.         Schippmann Jeffery, Hughes Garry and Prien Erich. The Use of Structured Multidomain Job Analysis for the Construction of Assessment Center Methods and Procedure // Journal of Business and Psychology 1, 1987. № 4. P. 353-366.

9.         Peterson Randall, Smith D. Brent, Martorana Paul and Owens Pamela. The Impact of Chief Executive Offi cer Personality on Top Management Team Dynamics: One Mechanism by Which Leadership Affects Organizational Performance //Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 2003. № 5. P. 795-808.

10.       Harter James, Schmidt Frank and Hayes Theodore. Business- Unit-Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis //Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 2002. № 2. P. 268-279.

11.       Boyatzis Richard. Competencies in the 21st Century// Journal of Management Development 27, 2008. № 1. P. 5-12.

12.       Hamel Gary and Prahalad C.K. Core Competence of the Corporation // Harvard Business Review, 1990. May-June. P. 79-91.

13.       Perrin Towers. Pulse Survey Report: Managing Talent in Tough Times. URL: www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?webc=USA (20.09.2009);

Effron Marc and Wellin Richard. 2009 State of Talent Management Survey // New Talent Management Network, 2009. January. URL: www.newtmn.com/survey.php

14.       Effron Marc and Wellin Richard. 2009 State of Talent Management Survey.

15.       Markus Leanne, Cooper-Thomas Helena and Keith Allpress Keith. Confounded by Competencies? An Evaluation of the Evolution and Use of Competency Models // New Zealand Journal of Psychology 34, 2005. July. № 2. P. 117-126.

16.       Kristof-Brown Amy, Zimmerman Ryan and Johnson Erin. Consequences of an Individuals’ Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Supervisor Fit // Personnel Psychology 58, 2005. № 2. P. 281-342.

17.       Porter Michael. On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

18.       Barney Jay. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage // Journal of Management 17, 1991. № 1. P. 99-120.

19.       Quinn Robert and Cameron Kim. Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence // Management Science 29, 1983, № 1. January 1983. P. 33-51.

20.       Tichy Noel and Mary Anne Devanna Mary Anne. The Transformational Leader. N. Y: John Wiley, 1986.

21.       Thomas Anisya, Litscher Robert and Ramaswamy Kanan. The Performance Impact of Strategy-Manager Coalignment: An Empirical Study// Strategic Management Journal 12, 1991. № 7. P. 509-522.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Научно-популярное издание

 

 

МАРК ЭФФРОН, МИРИАМ ОРТ

 

УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ТАЛАНТАМИ:

КРАТКИЙ КУРС

 

Выпускающий редактор А. Высочкина

 Редактор Е. Соколова

 Технический редактор Л. Синицына

 Корректоры Г. Москаленко, Л. Макарова Верстка Т. Коровенковой

 

ООО «Издательская Группа «Азбука-Аттикус» — обладатель товарного знака «Издательство Азбука Бизнес» 119334, Москва, 5-й Донской проезд, д. 15, стр. 4

 

Филиал ООО «Издательская Группа «Азбука-Аттикус» в г. Санкт-Петербурге

191123, Санкт-Петербург, набережная Робеспьера, д. 12, лит. А

 

ЧП «Издательство «Махаон-Украина»

04073, Киев, Московский проспект, д. 6, 2-й этаж

 

ЧП «Издательство «Махаон»

61070, Харьков, ул. Ак. Проскуры, д. 1

 

Знак информационной продукции (Федеральный закон № 436-ФЗ от 29.12.2010 г.)

 

Подписано в печать 05.11.2013.

Формат издания 60 X 90.

Бумага офсетная. Гарнитура «OriginalC».

Печать офсетная. Уел. печ. л. 14,0.

Тираж 3000 экз. B-AZB-12873-01-R. Заказ № 5378/13.

 

Отпечатано в соответствии с предоставленными материалами в ООО «ИПК Парето-Принт». 170546, Тверская область, Промышленная зона Боровлево-1, комплекс № ЗА

 www.pareto-print.ru